Couric Voice / Steal The Move

If you reached this Balkingpoints article by direct external link, stop by the front page for a rotating satellite view of the earth at night


image source: wcpo.com

Will sometimes pull up Katie Couric’s podcast on the cell while at chores around the house, because of the guests she gets and also because of that trademark broadcaster voice. It’s a good one and arguably was a success component in the best job of her career, Today Show co-host. Her voice was perfect for that kind of show.

She shared something on one of those podcasts I never knew – early in her career she retrained her voice with regard to it’s pitch.

Pretty low female pitch for Katie, right? When she started out in TV, she said she had a higher voice and was advised to shift it downward. It’s not that hard, you just find a pitch you’re comfortable with and force self to use it until it becomes second nature. That was super advice for her career.

Taking an objective viewpoint here – not anything in the way of critique of higher voices. But this is interesting & something almost never discussed in the public realm.

The trick of shifting vocal pitch downward is only useful for women, unless it’s a man with a high voice / same benefit. The lower pitches just resonate better, and that can help you in a job.

So Couric effectively tossed out a tip to anybody who wants it. Try it out on friends – worth a shot.

Roy@Balkingpoints

Published 2018 / all rights reserved

Balkingpoints (maybe) impacts 4/14 Democratic Debate

If you reached this Balkingpoints article by direct external link, stop by the front page for a rotating satellite view of the earth at night

My tweet above to the Dem debate moderators. Sure enough, Dana Bash asked the question. Here is the clip >




It’s possible of course she was already planning to ask it. The reason I wanted it in, and had asked moderators in previous debates to include it, is that it’s a debilitating retort to something I consider fundamentally dishonorable. Sanders has been citing Hillary’s Super PAC and corporate campaign contributors, and her speaking fees for months as if that automatically made her guilty of selling off her votes & views.

Sanders knows it’s garbage. He knows he has zero evidence she ever let contributions affect her policy positions, and that Barack Obama and Bill Clinton stood up against corporate interests and for working Americans many times – even though that kind of contribution helped them get elected.

Sanders has wanted to just run with the innuendo, imply she is corrupt and never have to back it up with any concrete example. It’s Rovian, and he was finally busted on it Thursday night.

He gives what appears to be an entirely unprepared answer – remarkable in itself. First he says Hillary’s decision that supports his months of guilt insinuation, is the 2008 Wall Street crash. Then he makes the brand new point that she takes money…

Pretty weak.

You don’t publicly impugn someone’s honesty and character, unless you can prove what you are saying. Sorry Mr. Sanders, it’s sleaze politics.

Roy@Balkingpoints

Published 2016 / all rights reserved